Review the question and records
We clarify the clinical question and tell you which reports are needed for a useful specialist review.
Search a condition, specialty, hospital, or doctor name to find relevant doctors and tertiary hospitals in China.
42,445 searchable doctors · 1,261 specialties · 120 tertiary hospitals · 5 cities
By doctor
Seeded from hospital source pages.
By specialty
Start from the clinical area.
By hospital
High-coverage official indexes.
Our service
We help international patients prepare a focused request, identify a relevant doctor or hospital, and obtain a clear second opinion pathway before they commit.
What we do
We clarify the clinical question and tell you which reports are needed for a useful specialist review.
We match the case to a relevant doctor, department, or tertiary hospital based on the information available.
We contact your requested doctor or hospital team and ask for availability, scope, timing, and price.
If the request is accepted, we confirm the required records, quoted fee, and practical next steps before you proceed.
Pricing
We review one focused medical question and identify the records needed to determine a practical route.
100% refundable. This is the coordination deposit, not the doctor's second opinion fee.
Quoted after the doctor or hospital reviews the available records, and confirmed before you proceed.
Clear terms
Charged only when a second opinion review is completed. Fully refunded if we cannot arrange it.
The doctor or hospital pathway, scope, timing, and final second opinion fee are confirmed before you proceed.
This is not emergency care, does not replace medical advice, and cannot guarantee doctor availability or hospital acceptance.
Start with one focused medical question. We will help determine the most practical route.
Official source
Index
Methodology
The product value is not a directory scrape. It is a cleaned, comparable clinical database.
Hospital pages anchor identity, department, title, and profile URL before any secondary source is merged.
Academic pages, public indexes, research snippets, and Google-result facts are cleaned into our own schema.
Profiles separate clinical focus, education, roles, publications, and verification status so patients can compare without guessing.
Process
The first workflow should help a patient narrow the question before any intake or payment layer exists.
Search by condition, specialty, hospital, city, title, or doctor name so the first result set is medically relevant.
Compare clinical focus, education, roles, research, verification status, and official profile links in one format.
The safe next step is a focused request with the medical question and contact preference, not full records or payment.
Guides
Each guide should lead to doctor, specialty, hospital, and evidence pages instead of a generic article dead end.
Best-fit doctors by thoracic surgery, oncology, radiotherapy, pathology, and imaging.
Translate records, identify the right department, then shortlist doctors with matching clinical focus.
Compare Grade A tertiary hospitals by department depth, doctor coverage, and city access.
Source transparency
The page separates official hospital facts from enrichment and review status, so trust is not hidden in a footnote.
Used for identity, hospital, department, title, profile URL, and official verification status.
Used only after cleaning into our schema, with conflicts kept as verification notes instead of separate source blocks.
The index supports discovery and comparison. It does not diagnose, rank medical quality, or replace physician judgment.
Next step
A marketplace starts with better search, but trust comes from verified records, clear boundaries, and a narrow first request.
Second opinion
Charged only when a second opinion review is completed. Fully refunded if we cannot arrange it.
Included
Not for emergencies or medical advice. Payment is not connected in this prototype.